[case]is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are:
1. the purpose for which the statement was made;
2. the purpose for which the statement was communicated;
3. the relationship between the advisor, advisee and any third party;
4. the size of the class to which the recipient of the advice belongs;
5. the knowledge and experience of the advisee; and
6. whether the statement could be reasonably relied upon.
Answer
McNaughton
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
[case]is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are:
1. the purpose for which the statement was made;
2. the purpose for which the statement was communicated;
3. the relationship between the advisor, advisee and any third party;
4. the size of the class to which the recipient of the advice belongs;
5. the knowledge and experience of the advisee; and
6. whether the statement could be reasonably relied upon.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
[case]is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are:
1. the purpose for which the statement was made;
2. the purpose for which the statement was communicated;
3. the relationship between the advisor, advisee and any third party;
4. the size of the class to which the recipient of the advice belongs;
5. the knowledge and experience of the advisee; and
6. whether the statement could be reasonably relied upon.
Answer
McNaughton
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it McNaughton is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.