The accident must also be of the kind that [...]. If there could be an innocent explanation of the accident, then the maxim will not work. A good illustration of this principle is the case of Mahon v Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14 where the principle was held to apply when a swab was left inside the body of a patient following an abdominal operation.
Answer
would not normally happen without negligence
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
The accident must also be of the kind that [...]. If there could be an innocent explanation of the accident, then the maxim will not work. A good illustration of this principle is the case of Mahon v Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14 where the principle was held to apply when a swab was left inside the body of a patient following an abdominal operation.
Answer
?
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
The accident must also be of the kind that [...]. If there could be an innocent explanation of the accident, then the maxim will not work. A good illustration of this principle is the case of Mahon v Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14 where the principle was held to apply when a swab was left inside the body of a patient following an abdominal operation.
Answer
would not normally happen without negligence
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The accident must also be of the kind that would not normally happen without negligence. If there could be an innocent explanation of the accident, then the maxim will not work. A good illustration of this principle is the case of Mahon v Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14 where th
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.