An art teacher was allowed to teach what he wished with no prescribed syllabus subject to only occasional visits by the Director of Drama Studies to his classes. He was found to be self- employed. Control is, therefore, non-conclusive but is still an important factor to be considered.
Answer
Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1WLR 1749
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vicarious-liability
Question
An art teacher was allowed to teach what he wished with no prescribed syllabus subject to only occasional visits by the Director of Drama Studies to his classes. He was found to be self- employed. Control is, therefore, non-conclusive but is still an important factor to be considered.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vicarious-liability
Question
An art teacher was allowed to teach what he wished with no prescribed syllabus subject to only occasional visits by the Director of Drama Studies to his classes. He was found to be self- employed. Control is, therefore, non-conclusive but is still an important factor to be considered.
Answer
Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1WLR 1749
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it However, in Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1WLR 1749 an art teacher was allowed to teach what he wished with no prescribed syllabus subject to only occasional visits by the Director of Drama Studies to his classes. He was found to be self-
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.