In [case]the House of Lords stated that, as a general rule, the employer (E) would remain vicariously liable and that it would be difficult for E to rebut this presumption.
Answer
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1947] AC 1
Tags
#law #negligence #tort
Question
In [case]the House of Lords stated that, as a general rule, the employer (E) would remain vicariously liable and that it would be difficult for E to rebut this presumption.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort
Question
In [case]the House of Lords stated that, as a general rule, the employer (E) would remain vicariously liable and that it would be difficult for E to rebut this presumption.
Answer
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1947] AC 1
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1947] AC 1 the House of Lords stated that, as a general rule, the employer (E) would remain vicariously liable and that it would be difficult for E to rebut this presumption.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.