Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Much emphasis is placed on the level of control enjoyed by the hirer over the worker and the provision of equipment. This case involved the hire of X (a crane driver) and his crane to H (a firm of stevedores), under a contract that specified that X was to be the servant of H. X’s wages continued to be paid by the original employer and although H could instruct him as to the work to be done on a day to day basis they did not tell him how to operate his crane. Taking all these factors into account (with particular emphasis on control), the House of Lords found that X was still the employee of E.
Answer
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1947] AC 1

Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Much emphasis is placed on the level of control enjoyed by the hirer over the worker and the provision of equipment. This case involved the hire of X (a crane driver) and his crane to H (a firm of stevedores), under a contract that specified that X was to be the servant of H. X’s wages continued to be paid by the original employer and although H could instruct him as to the work to be done on a day to day basis they did not tell him how to operate his crane. Taking all these factors into account (with particular emphasis on control), the House of Lords found that X was still the employee of E.
Answer
?

Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Much emphasis is placed on the level of control enjoyed by the hirer over the worker and the provision of equipment. This case involved the hire of X (a crane driver) and his crane to H (a firm of stevedores), under a contract that specified that X was to be the servant of H. X’s wages continued to be paid by the original employer and although H could instruct him as to the work to be done on a day to day basis they did not tell him how to operate his crane. Taking all these factors into account (with particular emphasis on control), the House of Lords found that X was still the employee of E.
Answer
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1947] AC 1
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.