In Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530 in which a bus conductor, with delusions of grandeur, attempted to drive a bus and in doing so managed to run over the plaintiff, the employer escaped the imposition of vicarious liability for the actions of their employees since [...].
Answer
the employees were deemed to have been acting outside the scope of their employment
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vicarious-liability
Question
In Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530 in which a bus conductor, with delusions of grandeur, attempted to drive a bus and in doing so managed to run over the plaintiff, the employer escaped the imposition of vicarious liability for the actions of their employees since [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vicarious-liability
Question
In Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530 in which a bus conductor, with delusions of grandeur, attempted to drive a bus and in doing so managed to run over the plaintiff, the employer escaped the imposition of vicarious liability for the actions of their employees since [...].
Answer
the employees were deemed to have been acting outside the scope of their employment
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it 00] 2 QB 530 in which a bus conductor, with delusions of grandeur, attempted to drive a bus and in doing so managed to run over the plaintiff, the employer escaped the imposition of vicarious liability for the actions of their employees since <span>the employees were deemed to have been acting outside the scope of their employment.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.