In Storey v Ashton (1869) LR4 QB 476, a driver returning from delivering wine as instructed by his employers was persuaded to set off on a deviation from the route back to his employer’s premises. The plaintiff, who was injured by his negligent driving, was denied recompense from the employer, on the grounds that [...].
Answer
the employee was not acting in the course of employment
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
In Storey v Ashton (1869) LR4 QB 476, a driver returning from delivering wine as instructed by his employers was persuaded to set off on a deviation from the route back to his employer’s premises. The plaintiff, who was injured by his negligent driving, was denied recompense from the employer, on the grounds that [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
In Storey v Ashton (1869) LR4 QB 476, a driver returning from delivering wine as instructed by his employers was persuaded to set off on a deviation from the route back to his employer’s premises. The plaintiff, who was injured by his negligent driving, was denied recompense from the employer, on the grounds that [...].
Answer
the employee was not acting in the course of employment
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ne as instructed by his employers was persuaded to set off on a deviation from the route back to his employer’s premises. The plaintiff, who was injured by his negligent driving, was denied recompense from the employer, on the grounds that <span>the employee was not acting in the course of employment. <span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.