Where one is dealing with a single cause for the damage, the test that must be satisfied is to show that ‘but for’ the defendant’s breach of duty the claimant would not have suffered the loss. See [case].
Answer
Cork v Kirby Maclean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402
Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Where one is dealing with a single cause for the damage, the test that must be satisfied is to show that ‘but for’ the defendant’s breach of duty the claimant would not have suffered the loss. See [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Where one is dealing with a single cause for the damage, the test that must be satisfied is to show that ‘but for’ the defendant’s breach of duty the claimant would not have suffered the loss. See [case].
Answer
Cork v Kirby Maclean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Where one is dealing with a single cause for the damage, the test that must be satisfied is to show that ‘but for’ the defendant’s breach of duty the claimant would not have suffered the loss. See Cork v Kirby Maclean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.