By contrast, in Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, the defendant negligently injured the plaintiff in a work accident. Some time later, the plaintiff suffered a further back injury, (non tortious) arising from an illness unconnected to the accident. This further injury meant [...]. It was held that the defendant’s liability ceased at the point that the further back injury developed. He did not have to compensate the plaintiff for the ‘vicissitudes of life’.
Answer
he was unable to work
Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
By contrast, in Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, the defendant negligently injured the plaintiff in a work accident. Some time later, the plaintiff suffered a further back injury, (non tortious) arising from an illness unconnected to the accident. This further injury meant [...]. It was held that the defendant’s liability ceased at the point that the further back injury developed. He did not have to compensate the plaintiff for the ‘vicissitudes of life’.
Answer
?
Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
By contrast, in Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, the defendant negligently injured the plaintiff in a work accident. Some time later, the plaintiff suffered a further back injury, (non tortious) arising from an illness unconnected to the accident. This further injury meant [...]. It was held that the defendant’s liability ceased at the point that the further back injury developed. He did not have to compensate the plaintiff for the ‘vicissitudes of life’.
Answer
he was unable to work
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it [1982] AC 794, the defendant negligently injured the plaintiff in a work accident. Some time later, the plaintiff suffered a further back injury, (non tortious) arising from an illness unconnected to the accident. This further injury meant <span>he was unable to work. It was held that the defendant’s liability ceased at the point that the further back injury developed. He did not have to compensate the plaintiff for the ‘vicissitudes of life’.</sp
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.