As previously discussed, in Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6, where the plaintiff accepted a lift with an obviously drunken pilot, the risk of injury was [...]. Therefore, an implied agreement to run the risk of injury could be established.
Answer
so great as to be the equivalent of ‘meddling with an unexploded bomb’
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
As previously discussed, in Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6, where the plaintiff accepted a lift with an obviously drunken pilot, the risk of injury was [...]. Therefore, an implied agreement to run the risk of injury could be established.
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
As previously discussed, in Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6, where the plaintiff accepted a lift with an obviously drunken pilot, the risk of injury was [...]. Therefore, an implied agreement to run the risk of injury could be established.
Answer
so great as to be the equivalent of ‘meddling with an unexploded bomb’
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it As previously discussed, in Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6, where the plaintiff accepted a lift with an obviously drunken pilot, the risk of injury was so great as to be the equivalent of ‘meddling with an unexploded bomb’. Therefore, an implied agreement to run the risk of injury could be established.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.