Allowances are made for the claimant who has been placed in an emergency or difficult dilemma. In [case], a runaway horse and carriage case, the plaintiff’s decision to jump from it was not contributorily negligent. The defendant could not criticise the plaintiff’s attempts to avoid the danger created by the defendant.
Answer
Jones v Boyce (1816) 1 Stark 493
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Allowances are made for the claimant who has been placed in an emergency or difficult dilemma. In [case], a runaway horse and carriage case, the plaintiff’s decision to jump from it was not contributorily negligent. The defendant could not criticise the plaintiff’s attempts to avoid the danger created by the defendant.
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Allowances are made for the claimant who has been placed in an emergency or difficult dilemma. In [case], a runaway horse and carriage case, the plaintiff’s decision to jump from it was not contributorily negligent. The defendant could not criticise the plaintiff’s attempts to avoid the danger created by the defendant.
Answer
Jones v Boyce (1816) 1 Stark 493
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Allowances are made for the claimant who has been placed in an emergency or difficult dilemma. In Jones v Boyce (1816) 1 Stark 493, a runaway horse and carriage case, the plaintiff’s decision to jump from it was not contributorily negligent. The defendant could not criticise the plaintiff’s attempts to avoid the
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.