Many cases still use [...]test, as cited in Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283. The defence has been criticised as being too much of a blunt instrument. If successful no liability is imposed and, in some cases, this can lead to a degree of injustice.
Answer
the affront to public conscience
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Many cases still use [...]test, as cited in Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283. The defence has been criticised as being too much of a blunt instrument. If successful no liability is imposed and, in some cases, this can lead to a degree of injustice.
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Many cases still use [...]test, as cited in Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283. The defence has been criticised as being too much of a blunt instrument. If successful no liability is imposed and, in some cases, this can lead to a degree of injustice.
Answer
the affront to public conscience
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Many cases still use the affront to public conscience test, as cited in Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283. The defence has been criticised as being too much of a blunt instrument. If successful no liability i
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.