Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
it was held in An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197 that [...]. The Court of Appeal considered that the relationship between the police and the informer was a confidential one, and the police owed an informer a duty of care to protect him from risks to his physical safety and wellbeing to which he was potentially exposed as a result of his activities in providing information about others.
Answer
while the police did not owe a duty of care to an informer in respect of pure economic loss, they would owe him a duty in respect of his physical safety

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
it was held in An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197 that [...]. The Court of Appeal considered that the relationship between the police and the informer was a confidential one, and the police owed an informer a duty of care to protect him from risks to his physical safety and wellbeing to which he was potentially exposed as a result of his activities in providing information about others.
Answer
?

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
it was held in An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197 that [...]. The Court of Appeal considered that the relationship between the police and the informer was a confidential one, and the police owed an informer a duty of care to protect him from risks to his physical safety and wellbeing to which he was potentially exposed as a result of his activities in providing information about others.
Answer
while the police did not owe a duty of care to an informer in respect of pure economic loss, they would owe him a duty in respect of his physical safety
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
it was held in An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197 that while the police did not owe a duty of care to an informer in respect of pure economic loss, they would owe him a duty in respect of his physical safety. The Court of Appeal considered that the relationship between the police and the informer was a confidential one, and the police owed an informer a duty of care to protect him from ri

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.