M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) Appellant v Stevenson Respondent [1932] AC 562
Facts: The appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer which was bought for her by her friend. The bottle was opaque and after she had drunk most of it she discovered it contained the remains of a decomposed snail. The appellant was unable to sue the retailer as there was no privity of contract between them. The appellant instead sought to sue the manufacturer, alleging that she had suffered shock and severe gastro-enteritis as a result. The House of Lords (by a majority of 3 to 2) held that a manufacturer was under a duty to [...].
Answer
the final purchaser or consumer to take reasonable care to ensure the article was free from any defect which would be injurious
Tags
#cases #duty-of-care #negligence #tort
Question
M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) Appellant v Stevenson Respondent [1932] AC 562
Facts: The appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer which was bought for her by her friend. The bottle was opaque and after she had drunk most of it she discovered it contained the remains of a decomposed snail. The appellant was unable to sue the retailer as there was no privity of contract between them. The appellant instead sought to sue the manufacturer, alleging that she had suffered shock and severe gastro-enteritis as a result. The House of Lords (by a majority of 3 to 2) held that a manufacturer was under a duty to [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#cases #duty-of-care #negligence #tort
Question
M’Alister (or Donoghue) (Pauper) Appellant v Stevenson Respondent [1932] AC 562
Facts: The appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer which was bought for her by her friend. The bottle was opaque and after she had drunk most of it she discovered it contained the remains of a decomposed snail. The appellant was unable to sue the retailer as there was no privity of contract between them. The appellant instead sought to sue the manufacturer, alleging that she had suffered shock and severe gastro-enteritis as a result. The House of Lords (by a majority of 3 to 2) held that a manufacturer was under a duty to [...].
Answer
the final purchaser or consumer to take reasonable care to ensure the article was free from any defect which would be injurious
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ntract between them. The appellant instead sought to sue the manufacturer, alleging that she had suffered shock and severe gastro-enteritis as a result. The House of Lords (by a majority of 3 to 2) held that a manufacturer was under a duty to <span>the final purchaser or consumer to take reasonable care to ensure the article was free from any defect which would be injurious.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.