Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#cases #clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11
Answer
Facts: Mrs Nadine Montgomery gave birth to a baby boy on 1 October 1999, at Bellshill Maternity Hospital, Lanarkshire. Unfortunately, her son was starved of oxygen during the birth and sustained severe brain damage. The shoulders of the baby got stuck during delivery (a complication known as shoulder dystocia) and there was a 12 minute delay in freeing the shoulders, resulting in the brain damage. In addition, the baby sustained paralysis in one arm caused by the force used in pulling him out. Mrs Montgomery’s principle claim was against her obstetrician for failing to give adequate warnings. The basis of her argument was that she, the mother, was small and diabetic, and that diabetes tends to lead to larger babies. Therefore, had she been warned of the risk of shoulder dystocia, she should also have been offered, and would have accepted, a caesarean section. The Supreme Court found for Mrs Montgomery, reversing the judgments at first instance and on appeal, and stating unequivocally that Sidaway should not be followed.

Tags
#cases #clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11
Answer
?

Tags
#cases #clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11
Answer
Facts: Mrs Nadine Montgomery gave birth to a baby boy on 1 October 1999, at Bellshill Maternity Hospital, Lanarkshire. Unfortunately, her son was starved of oxygen during the birth and sustained severe brain damage. The shoulders of the baby got stuck during delivery (a complication known as shoulder dystocia) and there was a 12 minute delay in freeing the shoulders, resulting in the brain damage. In addition, the baby sustained paralysis in one arm caused by the force used in pulling him out. Mrs Montgomery’s principle claim was against her obstetrician for failing to give adequate warnings. The basis of her argument was that she, the mother, was small and diabetic, and that diabetes tends to lead to larger babies. Therefore, had she been warned of the risk of shoulder dystocia, she should also have been offered, and would have accepted, a caesarean section. The Supreme Court found for Mrs Montgomery, reversing the judgments at first instance and on appeal, and stating unequivocally that Sidaway should not be followed.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 Facts: Mrs Nadine Montgomery gave birth to a baby boy on 1 October 1999, at Bellshill Maternity Hospital, Lanarkshire. Unfortunately, her son was starved of oxygen during the birth and s

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.