Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in [case]the court felt that such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place.
Answer
Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in [case]the court felt that such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place.
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in [case]the court felt that such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place.
Answer
Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679 the court felt that such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.