Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679 the court felt that [...].
Answer
such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place

Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679 the court felt that [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679 the court felt that [...].
Answer
such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Rescuers are generally protected from contributory negligence. However, in Harrison v BRB [1981] 3 All ER 679 the court felt that such protection would not be justified if the rescuer had negligently helped to create the emergency in the first place.

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.