The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691
Answer
The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691 the plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.