Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Answer
Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691

Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Answer
?

Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Answer
Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691 the plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.