The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Answer
Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to being injured by her.
Answer
Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2 QB 691 the plaintiff was a driving instructor who sued his pupil for injuries caused by the pupil’s negligent driving. The fact that he knew she was a learner driver did not mean he agreed to
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.