Natural events will not break the chain of causation if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) [...]. In Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751, further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in the realms of foreseeability.
Answer
the chain will be broken
Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Natural events will not break the chain of causation if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) [...]. In Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751, further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in the realms of foreseeability.
Answer
?
Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Natural events will not break the chain of causation if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) [...]. In Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751, further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in the realms of foreseeability.
Answer
the chain will be broken
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it tion if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) <span>the chain will be broken. In Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751, further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recovera
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.