Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Natural events will not break the chain of causation if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) the chain will be broken. In [case], further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in the realms of foreseeability.
Answer
Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751

Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Natural events will not break the chain of causation if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) the chain will be broken. In [case], further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in the realms of foreseeability.
Answer
?

Tags
#causation #law #negligence #tort
Question
Natural events will not break the chain of causation if they could have been foreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) the chain will be broken. In [case], further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in the realms of foreseeability.
Answer
Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
oreseen by the defendant and they should have taken them into account as events that were likely to happen. If the natural event was wholly unconnected with the defendant’s acts (independent and unforeseeable) the chain will be broken. In <span>Humber Oil Terminal Trustee Ltd v Sivand [1998] CLC 751, further expenses incurred in the repair of harbour installations caused by the collapse of the sea bed were still recoverable. The collapse was not a novus actus in that it was in th

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.