The claimant was injured when a number of large sacks of sugar fell onto her. She could not explain how this had occurred. However, since the sacks were in the defendant’s control, the court was prepared to infer that the accident had been due to the defendant’s lack of care, i.e. the sacks could not have fallen by themselves.
Answer
Scott v London and St Katherine Docks & Co (1865) 3 H & C 596
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant was injured when a number of large sacks of sugar fell onto her. She could not explain how this had occurred. However, since the sacks were in the defendant’s control, the court was prepared to infer that the accident had been due to the defendant’s lack of care, i.e. the sacks could not have fallen by themselves.
Answer
?
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant was injured when a number of large sacks of sugar fell onto her. She could not explain how this had occurred. However, since the sacks were in the defendant’s control, the court was prepared to infer that the accident had been due to the defendant’s lack of care, i.e. the sacks could not have fallen by themselves.
Answer
Scott v London and St Katherine Docks & Co (1865) 3 H & C 596
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Scott v London and St Katherine Docks & Co (1865) 3 H & C 596, the claimant was injured when a number of large sacks of sugar fell onto her. She could not explain how this had occurred. However, since the sacks were in the defendant’s control, the
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.