In Mullin v Richards [1998] 1 All ER 920, the defendant and claimant were both 15 year-old school girls. The claimant was injured when a piece of plastic ruler broke off during a ‘play fight’ and hit her in the eye. The Court of Appeal held that the correct test is [...]. On the facts of the case, the two schoolgirls could not reasonably have foreseen any significant risk of the likelihood of injury.
Answer
whether a reasonable and careful 15 year-old would have foreseen the risk of injury
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
In Mullin v Richards [1998] 1 All ER 920, the defendant and claimant were both 15 year-old school girls. The claimant was injured when a piece of plastic ruler broke off during a ‘play fight’ and hit her in the eye. The Court of Appeal held that the correct test is [...]. On the facts of the case, the two schoolgirls could not reasonably have foreseen any significant risk of the likelihood of injury.
Answer
?
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
In Mullin v Richards [1998] 1 All ER 920, the defendant and claimant were both 15 year-old school girls. The claimant was injured when a piece of plastic ruler broke off during a ‘play fight’ and hit her in the eye. The Court of Appeal held that the correct test is [...]. On the facts of the case, the two schoolgirls could not reasonably have foreseen any significant risk of the likelihood of injury.
Answer
whether a reasonable and careful 15 year-old would have foreseen the risk of injury
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it 8] 1 All ER 920, the defendant and claimant were both 15 year-old school girls. The claimant was injured when a piece of plastic ruler broke off during a ‘play fight’ and hit her in the eye. The Court of Appeal held that the correct test is <span>whether a reasonable and careful 15 year-old would have foreseen the risk of injury. On the facts of the case, the two schoolgirls could not reasonably have foreseen any significant risk of the likelihood of injury.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.