Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant suffered severe injuries during an attack by his former boyfriend. The claimant had informed the police of a series of violent and threatening telephone, internet and text messages, including death threats. The police treated it as a domestic matter and declined to look at the messages or to take any steps to protect the claimant. His case was struck out by the House of Lords, holding that the policy reasoning outlined in Hill applied. Note Lord Bingham’s dissenting opinion and ‘liability principle’.
Answer
Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant suffered severe injuries during an attack by his former boyfriend. The claimant had informed the police of a series of violent and threatening telephone, internet and text messages, including death threats. The police treated it as a domestic matter and declined to look at the messages or to take any steps to protect the claimant. His case was struck out by the House of Lords, holding that the policy reasoning outlined in Hill applied. Note Lord Bingham’s dissenting opinion and ‘liability principle’.
Answer
?

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant suffered severe injuries during an attack by his former boyfriend. The claimant had informed the police of a series of violent and threatening telephone, internet and text messages, including death threats. The police treated it as a domestic matter and declined to look at the messages or to take any steps to protect the claimant. His case was struck out by the House of Lords, holding that the policy reasoning outlined in Hill applied. Note Lord Bingham’s dissenting opinion and ‘liability principle’.
Answer
Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In the recent decision in Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50, the claimant suffered severe injuries during an attack by his former boyfriend. The claimant had informed the police of a series of violent and threatening telephone, internet and te

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.