The recent case of Merthyr Tydfil CBC v C [2010] EWHC 62 (QB) was distinguished on its facts because [...]. Where the parents are not suspected of abuse they may be owed a duty of care since this would not conflict with the duty owed to their child.
Answer
it was a third party rather than the parent who was suspected of abuse
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The recent case of Merthyr Tydfil CBC v C [2010] EWHC 62 (QB) was distinguished on its facts because [...]. Where the parents are not suspected of abuse they may be owed a duty of care since this would not conflict with the duty owed to their child.
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The recent case of Merthyr Tydfil CBC v C [2010] EWHC 62 (QB) was distinguished on its facts because [...]. Where the parents are not suspected of abuse they may be owed a duty of care since this would not conflict with the duty owed to their child.
Answer
it was a third party rather than the parent who was suspected of abuse
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The recent case of Merthyr Tydfil CBC v C [2010] EWHC 62 (QB) was distinguished on its facts because it was a third party rather than the parent who was suspected of abuse. Where the parents are not suspected of abuse they may be owed a duty of care since this would not conflict with the duty owed to their child.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.