In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were [...]. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where the person ostensibly under the duty had assumed responsibility for the victim. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.
Answer
under no duty to warn a tenant that his neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were [...]. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where the person ostensibly under the duty had assumed responsibility for the victim. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were [...]. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where the person ostensibly under the duty had assumed responsibility for the victim. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.
Answer
under no duty to warn a tenant that his neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were under no duty to warn a tenant that his neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where the person ostensibly under the duty had assu
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.