Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were under no duty to warn a tenant that his neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where [...]. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.
Answer
the person ostensibly under the duty had assumed responsibility for the victim

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were under no duty to warn a tenant that his neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where [...]. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.
Answer
?

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, it was held that the local authority were under no duty to warn a tenant that his neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where [...]. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.
Answer
the person ostensibly under the duty had assumed responsibility for the victim
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
neighbour might resort to violence after being informed (by the council) that he risked being evicted. A duty to warn someone that they might be at risk of injury/loss as a result of the criminal act of a third party would arise only where <span>the person ostensibly under the duty had assumed responsibility for the victim. In this case, nothing in the words or conduct of the council suggested that they had.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.