Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
Another illustration is provided by [case]. The Court of Appeal concluded that the defendant, the sole controlling body regulating professional boxing, breached its duty towards the claimant, Michael Watson, who had suffered permanent brain damage while fighting Chris Eubank. The Board should have had ringside resuscitation equipment available and doctors who knew how to use it. One factor which weighed with the court was that ‘serious brain damage … represented the most serious risk posed by the sport and one that required to be addressed’.
Answer
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd [2001] QB 1134

Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
Another illustration is provided by [case]. The Court of Appeal concluded that the defendant, the sole controlling body regulating professional boxing, breached its duty towards the claimant, Michael Watson, who had suffered permanent brain damage while fighting Chris Eubank. The Board should have had ringside resuscitation equipment available and doctors who knew how to use it. One factor which weighed with the court was that ‘serious brain damage … represented the most serious risk posed by the sport and one that required to be addressed’.
Answer
?

Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
Another illustration is provided by [case]. The Court of Appeal concluded that the defendant, the sole controlling body regulating professional boxing, breached its duty towards the claimant, Michael Watson, who had suffered permanent brain damage while fighting Chris Eubank. The Board should have had ringside resuscitation equipment available and doctors who knew how to use it. One factor which weighed with the court was that ‘serious brain damage … represented the most serious risk posed by the sport and one that required to be addressed’.
Answer
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd [2001] QB 1134
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Another illustration is provided by Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd [2001] QB 1134. The Court of Appeal concluded that the defendant, the sole controlling body regulating professional boxing, breached its duty towards the claimant, Michael Watson, who had suffered p

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.