The claimant must know of the risk and its extent before they can be said to be volens. This is subjective – did that particular claimant know? It is not a question of whether the reasonable claimant would have known, i.e. objective. For example, in [case]the plaintiff accepted a lift with a drunken pilot. The plaintiff was drunk as well and this had to be taken account of by the court in determining whether he appreciated the danger involved.
Answer
Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant must know of the risk and its extent before they can be said to be volens. This is subjective – did that particular claimant know? It is not a question of whether the reasonable claimant would have known, i.e. objective. For example, in [case]the plaintiff accepted a lift with a drunken pilot. The plaintiff was drunk as well and this had to be taken account of by the court in determining whether he appreciated the danger involved.
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The claimant must know of the risk and its extent before they can be said to be volens. This is subjective – did that particular claimant know? It is not a question of whether the reasonable claimant would have known, i.e. objective. For example, in [case]the plaintiff accepted a lift with a drunken pilot. The plaintiff was drunk as well and this had to be taken account of by the court in determining whether he appreciated the danger involved.
Answer
Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ant must know of the risk and its extent before they can be said to be volens. This is subjective – did that particular claimant know? It is not a question of whether the reasonable claimant would have known, i.e. objective. For example, in <span>Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6 the plaintiff accepted a lift with a drunken pilot. The plaintiff was drunk as well and this had to be taken account of by the court in determining whether he appreciated the danger inv
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.