The plaintiff was injured while watching a race. The plaintiff’s claim failed because ‘the type of danger to spectators was inherent in the sport and the plaintiff must be taken to have assented to the risk of such an accident...’
Answer
Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing Club [1933] 1 KB 205
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was injured while watching a race. The plaintiff’s claim failed because ‘the type of danger to spectators was inherent in the sport and the plaintiff must be taken to have assented to the risk of such an accident...’
Answer
?
Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
The plaintiff was injured while watching a race. The plaintiff’s claim failed because ‘the type of danger to spectators was inherent in the sport and the plaintiff must be taken to have assented to the risk of such an accident...’
Answer
Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing Club [1933] 1 KB 205
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Consent may be given expressly, e.g. a written agreement, or by implied conduct, e.g. sporting events. In Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing Club [1933] 1 KB 205 the plaintiff was injured while watching a race. The plaintiff’s claim failed because ‘the type of danger to spectators was inherent in the sport and the plaintiff must be taken to hav
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.