Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Gough v Thorne [1966] 3 All ER 398
Answer
A 13 year-old girl was hit by a lorry driven by the defendant whilst crossing a road. Earlier, a driver had indicated to her that the road was safe to cross. The court held that, taken into account her age, she had not contributed to her own injuries.

Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Gough v Thorne [1966] 3 All ER 398
Answer
?

Tags
#defences #law #negligence #tort
Question
Gough v Thorne [1966] 3 All ER 398
Answer
A 13 year-old girl was hit by a lorry driven by the defendant whilst crossing a road. Earlier, a driver had indicated to her that the road was safe to cross. The court held that, taken into account her age, she had not contributed to her own injuries.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In cases where the claimant is a child, the court will take into account their age in determining the standard of care to be expected. In Gough v Thorne [1966] 3 All ER 398 a 13 year-old girl was hit by a lorry driven by the defendant whilst crossing a road. Earlier, a driver had indicated to her that the road was safe to cross. The court held that, taken

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.