Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
McNaughton is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are: (6)
Answer
1. the purpose for which the statement was made;
2. the purpose for which the statement was communicated;
3. the relationship between the advisor, advisee and any third party;
4. the size of the class to which the recipient of the advice belongs;
5. the knowledge and experience of the advisee; and
6. whether the statement could be reasonably relied upon.

Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
McNaughton is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are: (6)
Answer
?

Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
McNaughton is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are: (6)
Answer
1. the purpose for which the statement was made;
2. the purpose for which the statement was communicated;
3. the relationship between the advisor, advisee and any third party;
4. the size of the class to which the recipient of the advice belongs;
5. the knowledge and experience of the advisee; and
6. whether the statement could be reasonably relied upon.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
McNaughton is an interesting decision because in that case Neill LJ set out a list of factors to consider in determining whether a duty of care arises in respect of a negligent misstatement. These are: 1. the purpose for which the statement was made; 2. the purpose for which the statement was communicated; 3. the relationship between the advisor, advisee and any third party;&

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.