There are also special provisions in relation to the police. In such cases the courts make a distinction between operational and policy matters. The police can be held liable (with some exceptions) for the former, but not the latter. This distinction is clearly evidenced in [ case ].
Answer
Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
There are also special provisions in relation to the police. In such cases the courts make a distinction between operational and policy matters. The police can be held liable (with some exceptions) for the former, but not the latter. This distinction is clearly evidenced in [ case ].
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
There are also special provisions in relation to the police. In such cases the courts make a distinction between operational and policy matters. The police can be held liable (with some exceptions) for the former, but not the latter. This distinction is clearly evidenced in [ case ].
Answer
Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it s in relation to the police. In such cases the courts make a distinction between operational and policy matters. The police can be held liable (with some exceptions) for the former, but not the latter. This distinction is clearly evidenced in <span>Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.