In Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985. Here the police had negligently fired a canister of CS gas into the plaintiff’s shop, which was under siege, without taking adequate precautions against the high risk of fire. When a fire occurred, the plaintiff was successful in his claim against the police, as [...].
Answer
this was a negligent operational act
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985. Here the police had negligently fired a canister of CS gas into the plaintiff’s shop, which was under siege, without taking adequate precautions against the high risk of fire. When a fire occurred, the plaintiff was successful in his claim against the police, as [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985. Here the police had negligently fired a canister of CS gas into the plaintiff’s shop, which was under siege, without taking adequate precautions against the high risk of fire. When a fire occurred, the plaintiff was successful in his claim against the police, as [...].
Answer
this was a negligent operational act
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it negligently fired a canister of CS gas into the plaintiff’s shop, which was under siege, without taking adequate precautions against the high risk of fire. When a fire occurred, the plaintiff was successful in his claim against the police, as <span>this was a negligent operational act.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.