Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
If a defendant actually creates a dangerous situation (even though it was no fault of his own) the law may still impose a positive duty to act in order to mitigate the danger. Again we have seen a clear example of this in [ case ] (see above under Emergency Services), in which a fire brigade were held to have no general duty of care to property owners unless they acted in such a manner as to actually aggravate the situation (in this case, by turning off the sprinkler system).
Answer
Capital and Counties plc v Hampshire County Council [1997] QB 1004

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
If a defendant actually creates a dangerous situation (even though it was no fault of his own) the law may still impose a positive duty to act in order to mitigate the danger. Again we have seen a clear example of this in [ case ] (see above under Emergency Services), in which a fire brigade were held to have no general duty of care to property owners unless they acted in such a manner as to actually aggravate the situation (in this case, by turning off the sprinkler system).
Answer
?

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
If a defendant actually creates a dangerous situation (even though it was no fault of his own) the law may still impose a positive duty to act in order to mitigate the danger. Again we have seen a clear example of this in [ case ] (see above under Emergency Services), in which a fire brigade were held to have no general duty of care to property owners unless they acted in such a manner as to actually aggravate the situation (in this case, by turning off the sprinkler system).
Answer
Capital and Counties plc v Hampshire County Council [1997] QB 1004
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
>If a defendant actually creates a dangerous situation (even though it was no fault of his own) the law may still impose a positive duty to act in order to mitigate the danger. Again we have seen a clear example of this in Capital and Counties plc v Hampshire County Council [1997] QB 1004 (see above under Emergency Services), in which a fire brigade were held to have no general duty of care to property owners unless they acted in such a manner as to actually aggravate t

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.