A good example of pure economic loss of this type arose in Spartan Steel (at 5.3). As a result of the electricity being cut off, the factory was not able to operate for some time. In addition to the loss suffered in respect of the metal damaged at the time, the plaintiffs also tried to claim that during the period of shutdown they could have made further profit from processing four further ‘melts’. This loss was held to be irrecoverable. It was purely financial loss which did not result from any damage to the plaintiff’s property. Lord Denning pointed out that [...]. Therefore, for policy reasons, the action failed on this head of the claim.
Answer
the plaintiff could have worked harder once the power was restored or that they could have had their own generator or insurance to cover such occurrences
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
A good example of pure economic loss of this type arose in Spartan Steel (at 5.3). As a result of the electricity being cut off, the factory was not able to operate for some time. In addition to the loss suffered in respect of the metal damaged at the time, the plaintiffs also tried to claim that during the period of shutdown they could have made further profit from processing four further ‘melts’. This loss was held to be irrecoverable. It was purely financial loss which did not result from any damage to the plaintiff’s property. Lord Denning pointed out that [...]. Therefore, for policy reasons, the action failed on this head of the claim.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
A good example of pure economic loss of this type arose in Spartan Steel (at 5.3). As a result of the electricity being cut off, the factory was not able to operate for some time. In addition to the loss suffered in respect of the metal damaged at the time, the plaintiffs also tried to claim that during the period of shutdown they could have made further profit from processing four further ‘melts’. This loss was held to be irrecoverable. It was purely financial loss which did not result from any damage to the plaintiff’s property. Lord Denning pointed out that [...]. Therefore, for policy reasons, the action failed on this head of the claim.
Answer
the plaintiff could have worked harder once the power was restored or that they could have had their own generator or insurance to cover such occurrences
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it n they could have made further profit from processing four further ‘melts’. This loss was held to be irrecoverable. It was purely financial loss which did not result from any damage to the plaintiff’s property. Lord Denning pointed out that <span>the plaintiff could have worked harder once the power was restored or that they could have had their own generator or insurance to cover such occurrences. Therefore, for policy reasons, the action failed on this head of the claim. <span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.