Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465: Recovery for negligent misstatement is only possible if there is found to be a special relationship between the parties and reasonable reliance by the claimant upon the defendant’s words. If these tests are satisfied then [...]. This case is of increasing importance, given the recent tendency of the courts to restrict the ambit of the other exceptions.
Answer
all the losses flowing from the misstatement are recoverable, including any pure economic loss that has been incurred
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465: Recovery for negligent misstatement is only possible if there is found to be a special relationship between the parties and reasonable reliance by the claimant upon the defendant’s words. If these tests are satisfied then [...]. This case is of increasing importance, given the recent tendency of the courts to restrict the ambit of the other exceptions.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465: Recovery for negligent misstatement is only possible if there is found to be a special relationship between the parties and reasonable reliance by the claimant upon the defendant’s words. If these tests are satisfied then [...]. This case is of increasing importance, given the recent tendency of the courts to restrict the ambit of the other exceptions.
Answer
all the losses flowing from the misstatement are recoverable, including any pure economic loss that has been incurred
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ad>Recovery for negligent misstatement is only possible if there is found to be a special relationship between the parties and reasonable reliance by the claimant upon the defendant’s words. If these tests are satisfied then all the losses flowing from the misstatement are recoverable, including any pure economic loss that has been incurred. This case is of increasing importance, given the recent tendency of the courts to restrict the ambit of the other exceptions.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.