The defendants negligently omitted to tell X, a purchaser of land, about the plaintiff’s charge on the land. This meant that X was not bound by the charge and so the plaintiffs suffered financial loss. This loss was as a result of the defendant’s careless statement to X, which X relied on, causing the plaintiff to suffer loss. The court awarded compensation as the defendant had breached a statutory duty that was designed to protect the plaintiff.
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
Ministry of Housing v Sharp CA [1970] 2 QB 223
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
Ministry of Housing v Sharp CA [1970] 2 QB 223
Answer
The defendants negligently omitted to tell X, a purchaser of land, about the plaintiff’s charge on the land. This meant that X was not bound by the charge and so the plaintiffs suffered financial loss. This loss was as a result of the defendant’s careless statement to X, which X relied on, causing the plaintiff to suffer loss. The court awarded compensation as the defendant had breached a statutory duty that was designed to protect the plaintiff.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Ministry of Housing v Sharp CA [1970] 2 QB 223 the defendants negligently omitted to tell X, a purchaser of land, about the plaintiff’s charge on the land. This meant that X was not bound by the charge and so the plaintiffs suffere
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.