Drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants evaded vicarious liability as the driver was doing an expressly forbidden act.
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Conway v George Wimpey & Co [1951] 2 KB 266
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Conway v George Wimpey & Co [1951] 2 KB 266
Answer
Drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants evaded vicarious liability as the driver was doing an expressly forbidden act.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Similarly, in Conway v George Wimpey & Co [1951] 2 KB 266 drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.