Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants evaded vicarious liability as the driver was doing an expressly forbidden act.
Answer
Conway v George Wimpey & Co [1951] 2 KB 266

Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants evaded vicarious liability as the driver was doing an expressly forbidden act.
Answer
?

Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants evaded vicarious liability as the driver was doing an expressly forbidden act.
Answer
Conway v George Wimpey & Co [1951] 2 KB 266
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Similarly, in Conway v George Wimpey & Co [1951] 2 KB 266 drivers were expressly prohibited from giving lifts to employees of other companies. The plaintiff was injured as a result of negligent driving by the employer’s driver. The defendants

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.