Interestingly, in the case of [ case ]the Court of Appeal found that, in certain circumstances, given there is no binding authority against the concept of dual vicarious liability, it is possible for two parties to be vicariously liable for the actions of the same, negligent employee. Dual liability might occur where an employee is lent or transferred to work for another and both employers are entitled, and obliged, to control the employee’s actions so as to prevent the negligent act.
Answer
Viasystems Ltd v Thermal Transfer Ltd and Others [2005] EWCA Civ 1151
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vicarious-liability
Question
Interestingly, in the case of [ case ]the Court of Appeal found that, in certain circumstances, given there is no binding authority against the concept of dual vicarious liability, it is possible for two parties to be vicariously liable for the actions of the same, negligent employee. Dual liability might occur where an employee is lent or transferred to work for another and both employers are entitled, and obliged, to control the employee’s actions so as to prevent the negligent act.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vicarious-liability
Question
Interestingly, in the case of [ case ]the Court of Appeal found that, in certain circumstances, given there is no binding authority against the concept of dual vicarious liability, it is possible for two parties to be vicariously liable for the actions of the same, negligent employee. Dual liability might occur where an employee is lent or transferred to work for another and both employers are entitled, and obliged, to control the employee’s actions so as to prevent the negligent act.
Answer
Viasystems Ltd v Thermal Transfer Ltd and Others [2005] EWCA Civ 1151
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Interestingly, in the case of Viasystems Ltd v Thermal Transfer Ltd and Others [2005] EWCA Civ 1151 the Court of Appeal found that, in certain circumstances, given there is no binding authority against the concept of dual vicarious liability, it is possible for two parties to be vicari
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.