[ case ]concerned a casual waiter found not to be an employee on the grounds that he had no obligation to work, nor did his employers have any obligation to provide him with work.
Answer
O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte [1984] QB 90
Tags
#law #negligence #tort
Question
[ case ]concerned a casual waiter found not to be an employee on the grounds that he had no obligation to work, nor did his employers have any obligation to provide him with work.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort
Question
[ case ]concerned a casual waiter found not to be an employee on the grounds that he had no obligation to work, nor did his employers have any obligation to provide him with work.
Answer
O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte [1984] QB 90
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte [1984] QB 90 concerned a casual waiter found not to be an employee on the grounds that he had no obligation to work, nor did his employers have any obligation to provide him with work.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.