Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2005] EWCA Civ 251
Answer
The claimant alleged that he had been harassed by his manager within the meaning of s 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and that their mutual employer was vicariously liable for the manager’s behaviour. It was held that vicarious liability could be imposed for breach of statutory duty as well as for common law claims, provided the test in Lister v Hesley Hall was made out.
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2005] EWCA Civ 251
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2005] EWCA Civ 251
Answer
The claimant alleged that he had been harassed by his manager within the meaning of s 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and that their mutual employer was vicariously liable for the manager’s behaviour. It was held that vicarious liability could be imposed for breach of statutory duty as well as for common law claims, provided the test in Lister v Hesley Hall was made out.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The issue of whether an employer is vicariously liable for a breach of statutory duty by an employee was considered in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2005] EWCA Civ 251. The claimant alleged that he had been harassed by his manager within the meaning of s 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and that their mutual employer was vicariously liab
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.