Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458
Answer
Despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal found that the hitch-hiker was a trespasser and the employee was not acting within the scope of his employment.

Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458
Answer
?

Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458
Answer
Despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal found that the hitch-hiker was a trespasser and the employee was not acting within the scope of his employment.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458, despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal fo

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.