Despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal found that the hitch-hiker was a trespasser and the employee was not acting within the scope of his employment.
Answer
Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal found that the hitch-hiker was a trespasser and the employee was not acting within the scope of his employment.
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #tort #vl
Question
Despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal found that the hitch-hiker was a trespasser and the employee was not acting within the scope of his employment.
Answer
Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Twine v Bean Express Ltd [1946] 62 TLR 458, despite express instructions not to do so, a lorry driver (an employee) picked up a hitch-hiker, who was subsequently injured as a result of negligent driving. The Court of Appeal fo
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.