Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract:
Answer
White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract:
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract:
Answer
White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract: White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.