The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract:
Answer
White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract:
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract:
Answer
White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract: White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.