The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from [...]: White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
Answer
going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from [...]: White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from [...]: White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
Answer
going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The duty to mitigate does not, however, preclude a party, when suing on a debt, from going to the expense of performing his side of the contract after the other party has wrongfully repudiated the contract: White & Carter v McGregor [1962] AC 413.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.