In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' it generally will not be held to break the chain of causation.
Answer
Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' it generally will not be held to break the chain of causation.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' it generally will not be held to break the chain of causation.
Answer
Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' (Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196) it generally will not be held to break the chain of causation.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.