In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' (Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196) it generally will [...].
Answer
not be held to break the chain of causation
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' (Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196) it generally will [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' (Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196) it generally will [...].
Answer
not be held to break the chain of causation
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In terms of a novus actus interveniens, if the intervening event was 'likely to happen' (Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v A/B Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196) it generally will not be held to break the chain of causation.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.