Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The court has a discretionary power to grant an injunction to restrain the breach of a negative term of a contract even though [...], e.g. in the case of a contract of personal service. The rationale of the jurisdiction to grant an injunction to restrain a breach of contract was explained by Lord St Leonards LC, in Lumley v Wagner (1852) 1 De GM & G 604:

Wherever this court has not proper jurisdiction to enforce specific performance, it operates to bind men's consciences, so far as they can be bound, to a true and literal performance of their agreements; and it will not suffer them to depart from their contracts at their pleasure, leaving the party with whom they have contracted to the mere chance of any damages which a jury may give. The exercise of this jurisdiction has, I believe, had a wholesome tendency towards the maintenance of that good faith which exists in this country to a much greater degree perhaps than in any other; and although the jurisdiction is not to be extended, yet a judge would desert his duty who did not act up to what his predecessors have handed down as the rule for his guidance in the administration of such an equity.

Answer
the positive part of the contract is not specifically enforceable

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The court has a discretionary power to grant an injunction to restrain the breach of a negative term of a contract even though [...], e.g. in the case of a contract of personal service. The rationale of the jurisdiction to grant an injunction to restrain a breach of contract was explained by Lord St Leonards LC, in Lumley v Wagner (1852) 1 De GM & G 604:

Wherever this court has not proper jurisdiction to enforce specific performance, it operates to bind men's consciences, so far as they can be bound, to a true and literal performance of their agreements; and it will not suffer them to depart from their contracts at their pleasure, leaving the party with whom they have contracted to the mere chance of any damages which a jury may give. The exercise of this jurisdiction has, I believe, had a wholesome tendency towards the maintenance of that good faith which exists in this country to a much greater degree perhaps than in any other; and although the jurisdiction is not to be extended, yet a judge would desert his duty who did not act up to what his predecessors have handed down as the rule for his guidance in the administration of such an equity.

Answer
?

Tags
#contract #law #remedies
Question
The court has a discretionary power to grant an injunction to restrain the breach of a negative term of a contract even though [...], e.g. in the case of a contract of personal service. The rationale of the jurisdiction to grant an injunction to restrain a breach of contract was explained by Lord St Leonards LC, in Lumley v Wagner (1852) 1 De GM & G 604:

Wherever this court has not proper jurisdiction to enforce specific performance, it operates to bind men's consciences, so far as they can be bound, to a true and literal performance of their agreements; and it will not suffer them to depart from their contracts at their pleasure, leaving the party with whom they have contracted to the mere chance of any damages which a jury may give. The exercise of this jurisdiction has, I believe, had a wholesome tendency towards the maintenance of that good faith which exists in this country to a much greater degree perhaps than in any other; and although the jurisdiction is not to be extended, yet a judge would desert his duty who did not act up to what his predecessors have handed down as the rule for his guidance in the administration of such an equity.

Answer
the positive part of the contract is not specifically enforceable
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The court has a discretionary power to grant an injunction to restrain the breach of a negative term of a contract even though the positive part of the contract is not specifically enforceable, e.g. in the case of a contract of personal service. The rationale of the jurisdiction to grant an injunction to restrain a breach of contract was explained by Lord St Leonards LC, in L

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.